Physical therapists' perspectives of the construct of motor learning, and their motor learning-based practice: a qualitative study

Introduction: The perceptions and beliefs of physical therapists play an important role in their clinical behavior. These clinician-related aspects may contribute to the knowledge-action gap in the field of motor learning (ML). Accordingly, this study explored how a sample of physical therapists perceive ML in their practice. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted. Twelve physical therapists with a wide range of work experience were purposefully selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis methodology. Themes and categories were identified. Results: We identified five key themes: 1) 'ML within the scope of PT' showed that participants perceived ML as a fundamental part of the profession; 2) 'Understanding of ML' showed that participants had difficulty understanding the field comprehensively; 3) 'Self-efficacy toward the topic of ML' revealed that participants had low self-efficacy about their knowledge of the topic; 4) 'Features of ML implementation' showed that physical therapists tended to implement ML intuitively; and 5) 'Barriers to implementation and ways to facilitate it' showed that lack of knowledge was perceived as a main barrier to implementation. Conclusions: Physical therapists' perceptions of and experiences with ML showed the complexity of the field and the lack of clarity regarding its theoretical content and clinical applications. There is a need to reinforce knowledge of ML among physical therapists at different levels of professional development and to promote self-efficacy toward its use, possibly by increasing ML knowledge and education while emphasizing its clinical context.

Automated summary

The study revealed that physical therapists have difficulty understanding motor learning comprehensively and generally lack self-efficacy in this area. They tend to implement motor learning intuitively, perceiving lack of knowledge as the main barrier to implementation.