4.2 Article

A smart inertial system for fall detection

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-019-01573-y

关键词

ADL; Classification; Embedded architecture; Fall detection

资金

  1. SUMMIT grant under Horizon 2020-PON 2014/2020 programme [F/050270/03/X32-CUP B68I17000370008-COR: 130150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientists worldwide have been developing solutions to address the high incidence of falls in elderly and people with neurological diseases, ranging from traditional gait training to more technological approaches. When choosing among the different solutions available, it is important to consider factors such as performance, user acceptance, and power requirements.
The high incidence of falls in elderly and people with neurological disease, represents a serious issue which can have tremendous consequences. To reduce the effect on the society of this phenomenon, scientist in every part of the world, have tried to develop solutions ranging from gait training to more technological approaches such as the assistive device. Although it is evident that the scientific community has developed different and valuable paradigms for the ADLs and fall detection issue, in selecting one of the many possible solution, one has to consider the different advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, user acceptance and power requirements. In order to meet the necessity to develop solutions and paradigms that can be suitable for battery-powered operations, with specific focus to low power embedded systems, in this paper a Fall and ADLs classification paradigm exploiting an event correlated approach is proposed. It is based on the maximum value of the correlation between two signals implemented in an ad-hoc developed embedded system based on an STmicroelectronics microcontroller equipped with sensors and communication facilities. Results confirm the suitability of the presented methodology showing an average sensitivity (S-e) of 0.97 and an average specificity (S-p) of 0.97.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据