4.8 Article

Long-Lived Plasma Cells Secrete High-Affinity Antibodies Responding to a T-Dependent Immunization in a Teleost Fish

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02324

关键词

Ictalurus punctatus; long-lived plasma cells; affinity; anterior kidney; affinity-driven selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972818, 31902396, 31472302, 31172432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent discovery of long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in mammals, which provide a constant expression of specific high-affinity antibodies that mediate humoral memory, has caused a dramatic paradigm shift in the study of immunity and vaccine development. In teleost fish, there are few studies regarding the association between LLPCs and antibody production, and the affinity of the antibodies secreted by the LLPCs is poorly understood. In the present study, channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were immunized with trinitrophenylated-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (TNP-KLH) to examine TNP-specific antibody titers, affinities, antibody-secreting cell (ASC) dynamic changes, and especially the affinity of secreted antibodies by LLPCs post-immunization. We demonstrated that TNP-specific LLPCs were generated starting at week 4 post-immunization, achieved a maximal number at week 8, and maintained a comparable level throughout the 18-week post-immunization period, which was correlated with the dynamics of serum antibody titers and affinity maturation in the response. The LLPCs appeared to mostly reside within, or migrate to, the anterior kidney (bone marrow-like tissue in mammals), but a small portion was also located in the spleen and peripheral blood. The antibodies produced by the LLPCs possessed high affinities, indicating that the generation and development of LLPCs were driven by affinity selection in teleosts. Collectively, the results of this study provide insights toward the evolutionary understanding of the affinity-dependent mechanism of LLPC generation and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据