4.6 Article

Wind Load Characteristics of Wind Barriers Induced by High-Speed Trains Based on Field Measurements

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 9, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9224865

关键词

high-speed railway; wind barrier; wind loads; multi-resolution analysis; field measurements

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB1201204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51508580, U1534206, 51708202]
  3. Natural Science Foundations of Hunan Province [2016JJ3149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on field measurements and analyses of train-generated wind loads on wind barriers (3.0 m height and porosity 0%) with respect to different running speeds of the CRH380A EMU vehicle. Multi-resolution analysis was conducted to identify the pressure distribution in different frequency bands. Results showed that the wind pressure on the wind barrier caused by train-induced wind had two significant impacts with opposite directions, which were the head wave and tail wave. The peak wind pressure on the wind barrier was approximately proportional to the square of the speed of the train, and the peak wind pressure decreased rapidly along the wind barrier height from the bottom of the wind barrier. The maximum wind pressure occurred at the rail surface height. Furthermore, results of the multi-resolution analysis illustrated that the energy of the frequency band from 0 to 2.44 Hz accounted for 94% of the total energy. This indicated that the low-frequency range component of the wind pressure dominated the design of the wind barrier. The frequency of pulse excitation of train-induced wind loads may overlap with the natural frequency of barriers, and may lead to fatigue failure due to cyclic loads generated by the repeated passage of high-speed trains. In addition, the speed of the train had a negligible effect on the energy distribution of the wind pressure in the frequency domain, while the extreme pressure increased slightly with the increase of the speed of the train.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据