4.8 Article

Pericytes Contribute to Dysfunction in a Human 3D Model of Placental Microvasculature through VEGF-Ang-Tie2 Signaling

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201900878

关键词

angiogenesis; pericytes; placenta; pre-eclampsia; vascular dysfunction

资金

  1. NSERC post-doctoral fellowship
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0939511]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. MIT Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Placental vasculopathies are associated with a number of pregnancy-related diseases, including pre-eclampsia (PE)-a leading cause of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Placental presentations of PE are associated with endothelial dysfunction, reduced vessel perfusion, white blood cell infiltration, and altered production of angiogenic factors within the placenta (a candidate mechanism). Despite maintaining vascular quiescence in other tissues, how pericytes contribute to vascular growth and signaling in the placenta remains unknown. Here, pericytes are hypothesized to play a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of placental vascular growth. A perfusable triculture model is developed, consisting of human endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and pericytes, capable of recapitulating growth and remodeling in a system that mimics inflamed placental microvessels. Placental pericytes are shown to contribute to growth restriction of microvessels over time, an effect that is strongly regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor and Angiopoietin/Tie2 signaling. Furthermore, this model is capable of recapitulating essential processes including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha)-mediated vascular leakage and leukocyte infiltration, both important aspects associated with placental PE. This placental vascular model highlights that an imbalance in endothelial-pericyte crosstalk can play a critical role in the development of vascular pathology and associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据