4.1 Article

Analysis Of Re-Hospitalizations For Patients With Heart Failure Caused By Coronary Heart Disease: Data Of First Event And Recurrent Event

期刊

THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 1333-1341

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S218694

关键词

heart failure; coronary heart disease; re-hospitalization; conditional frailty model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872714]
  2. General Program for Young Scholar of Shanxi Province [201801D221423]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Shanxi Provincial Health Committee [2017038, 2018039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The re-hospitalization rate of patients with heart failure remains at a high level, and studies of the subject have focused mainly on event-time outcomes. In addition to using re-hospitalization data with the outcomes of the event-time-count, this study introduces the conditional frailty model, which could help obtain more reasonable results. Materials and methods: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled 1484 patients with heart failure caused by coronary heart disease. The outcomes of heart failure readmissions and the case report form data were collected. Based on the traditional Cox model with event-time outcomes, the mixed effects of a conditional frailty model were added to analyze the event-time-count longitudinal data. Results: The Cox regression model showed that non-manual work, diastolic dysfunction, and better medical compensation increased the risk of heart failure readmission, whereas treatment with beta-blockers decreased the risk. The conditional frailty model further revealed that age, female sex, non-manual work, better medical compensation, longer QRS duration, and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention increased the risk of heart failure readmission. Conclusion: This study obtained more reliable, reasonable results based on longitudinal data and a mixed model. The results could provide more clinical epidemiological evidence for the management of heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据