4.7 Review

Nanomaterials towards Biosensing of Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9121663

关键词

nanomaterials; electrochemical; optical; immunosensor; DNA sensor; biosensor; gold nanoparticles; carbon nanotubes; graphene; polymers

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UID/EQU/00511/2019, UID/QUI/50006/2019]
  2. FEDER funds through COMPETE2020-Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939]
  3. (PIDDAC) through FCT/MCTES [UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  4. FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC)
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/131755/2017]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/131755/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an incurable and highly debilitating condition characterized by the progressive degeneration and/or death of nerve cells, which leads to manifestation of disabilities in cognitive functioning. In recent years, the development of biosensors for determination of AD's main biomarkers has made remarkable progress, particularly based on the tremendous advances in nanoscience and nanotechnology. The unique and outstanding properties of nanomaterials (such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, gold, silver and magnetic nanoparticles, polymers and quantum dots) have been contributing to enhance the electrochemical and optical behavior of transducers while offering a suitable matrix for the immobilization of biological recognition elements. Therefore, optical and electrochemical immuno- and DNA-biosensors with higher sensitivity, selectivity and longer stability have been reported. Nevertheless, strategies based on the detection of multiple analytes still need to be improved, as they will play a crucial role in minimizing misdiagnosis. This review aims to provide insights into the conjugation of nanomaterials with different transducers highlighting their crucial role in the construction of biosensors for detection of AD main biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据