4.7 Article

The Antimalarial Chloroquine Reduces the Burden of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01392

关键词

chloroquine; persistent atrial fibrillation; potassium inward rectifiers; I-KACh; I-K1

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21HL138064, R01HL129136]
  2. Direccion General de Politica Cientifica de la Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 2016/088]
  3. ACM SIGHPC/Intel Computational & Data Science fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In clinical practice, reducing the burden of persistent atrial fibrillation by pharmacological means is challenging. We explored if blocking the background and the acetylcholine-activated inward rectifier potassium currents (I-K1 and I-KACh) could be antiarrhythmic in persistent atrial fibrillation. We thus tested the hypothesis that blocking I-K1 and I-KACh with chloroquine decreases the burden of persistent atrial fibrillation. We used patch clamp to determine the IC50 of I-K1 and I-KACh block by chloroquine and molecular modeling to simulate the interaction between chloroquine and Kir2.1 and Kir3.1, the molecular correlates of I-K1 and I-KACh. We then tested, as a proof of concept, if oral chloroquine administration to a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation can decrease the arrhythmia burden. We also simulated the effects of chloroquine in a 3D model of human atria with persistent atrial fibrillation. In patch clamp the IC50 of I-K1 block by chloroquine was similar to that of I-KACh. A 14-day regimen of oral chloroquine significantly decreased the burden of persistent atrial fibrillation in a patient. Mathematical simulations of persistent atrial fibrillation in a 3D model of human atria suggested that chloroquine prolonged the action potential duration, leading to failure of reentrant excitation, and the subsequent termination of the arrhythmia. The combined block of I-K1 and I-KACh can be a targeted therapeutic strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据