4.5 Article

3D Hierarchical NiCo Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheet Arrays Decorated with Noble Metal Nanoparticles for Enhanced Urea Electrocatalysis

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 163-174

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201901423

关键词

double layered hydroxide; nanosheet arrays; nanoparticles; urea electrocatalysis; electronic structure

资金

  1. national key research and development program [2016YFB0901600]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY19E020014]
  3. NSFC [21303162, 11604295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrocatalysis of urea represents an important potential as an efficient technology for sustainable energy development. This anodic reaction generates hydrogen or electrical power through direct electrooxidation of urea molecules, but is greatly inhibited by its slow kinetics. Therefore, tailoring highly efficient, earth-abundant, and durable electrocatalysts for urea oxidation reaction (UOR) is a fundamental for the enhancement of green energy conversion technologies. Herein, we report a scalable synthetic strategy to construct three-dimensional (3D) nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide nanosheet arrays (NiCo-LDH NSAs) with silver (Ag-0) or gold (Au-0) and palladium (Pd-0) intercalants as high performance catalysts for UOR. Experimental results suggest that the interlayer spacing of multi-anions LDH NSAs can effectively afford synergetic effects of increased electrochemical surface area, better exposure of catalytically active sites, and favorable adsorption energy of urea molecules. As expected, the deposition of noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) could successfully modulate the electronic structure, delivering a rise to significantly improved UOR activity. Specifically, the Au/NiCo-LDH hybrid exhibits a superior electro-catalytic performance toward urea electrooxidation with a highest current. These findings offer an effective pathway to prepare potential earth-abundant electrocatalysts for direct urea fuel cells (DUFCs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据