4.3 Article

Congestion avoidance and fault detection in WSNs using data science techniques

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ett.3756

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the transmission rate and fault detection in wireless sensor networks. Transmission rate control methods are proposed and support vector machine (SVM) is used for congestion control. By adjusting SVM parameters, classification errors are reduced. For fault detection, an enhanced random forest is introduced to detect faults in sensor readings and outperforms other techniques.
Transmission rate is one of the contributing factors in the performance of wireless sensor networks. Congested network causes reduced network response time, queuing delay, and more packet loss. To address the issue of congestion, we have proposed transmission rate control methods. To avoid the congestion, we have adjusted the transmission rate at current node based on its traffic loading information. Multiclassification is done to control the congestion using an effective data science technique, namely support vector machine (SVM). In order to get less miss classification error, differential evolution (DE) and grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithms are used to tune the SVM parameters. The comparative analysis has shown that the proposed approaches DE-SVM and GWO-SVM are more proficient than other classification techniques. Moreover, DE-SVM and GWO-SVM have outperformed the benchmark technique genetic algorithm-SVM by producing 3% and 1% less classification errors, respectively. For fault detection in wireless sensor networks, we have induced four types of faults in the sensor readings and detected the faults using the proposed enhanced random forest. We have made a comparative analysis with state of the art data science techniques based on two metrics, ie, detection accuracy and true positive rate. Enhanced random forest has detected the faults with 81% percent accuracy and outperformed the other classifiers in fault detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据