4.0 Article

JAK2V617F-mutant vascular niche contributes to JAK2V617F clonal expansion in myeloproliferative neoplasms

期刊

BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 42-48

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.09.004

关键词

Myeloproliferative neoplasms; Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells; Microenvironment; Endothelial cells; JAK2(V617F); MPL

资金

  1. Veterans Affairs Career Development Award [CDA210959632]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant [R01DK049855]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) expansion and overproduction of blood cells. The acquired mutation JAK2(V617F) plays a central role in these disorders. Mechanisms responsible for MPN HSPC expansion is not fully understood, limiting the effectiveness of current treatments. Endothelial cells (ECs) carrying the JAK2(V617F) mutation can be detected in patients with MPNs, suggesting that ECs are involved in the pathogenesis of MPNs. Here we report that JAK2(V617F)-bearing primary murine ECs have increased cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro compared to JAK2(WT) ECs. While there was no difference between JAK2(V617F) and JAK2(WT) HSPC proliferation when co-cultured with JAK2(WT) EC, the JAK2(V617F) HSPC displayed a relative growth advantage over the JAK2(WT) HSPC when co-cultured on JAK2(V617F) EC. In addition, the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor MPL is up regulated in JAK2(V617F) ECs and contributes to the maintenance/expansion of the JAK2(V617F) clone over JAK2(WT) clone in vitro. Considering that ECs are an essential component of the hematopoietic niche and most HSPCs reside in the perivascular niche, our studies suggest that the JAK2(V617F)-bearing ECs form an important component of the MPN vascular niche and contribute to mutant stem/progenitor cell expansion, likely through a critical role of the TPO/MPL signaling axis. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据