4.7 Article

Metformin improves defective hematopoiesis and delays tumor formation in Fanconi anemia mice

期刊

BLOOD
卷 128, 期 24, 页码 2774-2784

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-683490

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [P01 HL048546]
  3. Fanconi Anemia Research Foundation
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Bone Marrow Failure Research Program [W81XWH-14-1-0297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited bone marrow failure disorder associated with a high incidence of leukemia and solid tumors. Bone marrow transplantation is currently the only curative therapy for the hematopoietic complications of this disorder. However, long-term morbidity and mortality remain very high, and new therapeutics are badly needed. Here we show that the widely used diabetes drug metformin improves hematopoiesis and delays tumor formation in Fancd2 2/2 mice. Metformin is the first compound reported to improve both of these FA phenotypes. Importantly, the beneficial effects are specific toFA mice and are not seen in the wild-type controls. In this preclinical model of FA, metformin outperformed the current standard of care, oxymetholone, by improving peripheral blood counts in Fancd2 2/2 mice significantly faster. Metformin increased the size of the hematopoietic stem cell compartment and enhanced quiescence in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. In tumor-prone Fancd2 2/2 Trp53 1/2 mice, metformin delayed the onset of tumors and significantly extended the tumor-free survival time. In addition, we found that metformin and the structurally related compound aminoguanidine reduced DNA damage and ameliorated spontaneous chromosome breakage and radials in human FA patient-derived cells. Our results also indicate that aldehyde detoxificationmight be one of the mechanisms by which metformin reducesDNAdamage in FA cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据