4.4 Article

Higher spin de Sitter Hilbert space

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2019)071

关键词

1/N Expansion; Gauge-gravity correspondence; Higher Spin Gravity; Models of Quantum Gravity

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [de-sc0011941]
  2. FWO Flanders
  3. NSF
  4. ANR grant Black-dS-String
  5. CEA Enhanced Eurotalents project De Sitter Holography
  6. AMIAS
  7. Institute for Theoretical Physics
  8. STFC [ST/P000258/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a complete microscopic definition of the Hilbert space of minimal higher spin de Sitter quantum gravity and its Hartle-Hawking vacuum state. The funda-mental degrees of freedom are 2N bosonic fields living on the future conformal boundary, where N is proportional to the de Sitter horizon entropy. The vacuum state is normalizable. The model agrees in perturbation theory with expectations from a previously proposed dS-CFT description in terms of a fermionic Sp(N) model, but it goes beyond this, both in its conceptual scope and in its computational power. In particular it resolves the apparent pathologies affecting the Sp(N) model, and it provides an exact formula for late time vac-uum correlation functions. We illustrate this by computing probabilities for arbitrarily large field excursions, and by giving fully explicit examples of vacuum 3- and 4-point functions. We discuss bulk reconstruction and show the perturbative bulk QFT canonical commutations relations can be reproduced from the fundamental operator algebra, but only up to a minimal error term similar to e(-O(N )), and only if the operators are coarse grained in such a way that the number of accessible pixels is less than O(N ). Independent of this, we show that upon gauging the higher spin symmetry group, one is left with 2N physical degrees of freedom, and that all gauge invariant quantities can be computed by a 2N x 2N matrix model. This suggests a concrete realization of the idea of cosmological complementarity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据