4.7 Review

Peg Biology: Deciphering the Molecular Regulations Involved During Peanut Peg Development

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01289

关键词

abscisic acid; embryo abortion; peanut; gravitropism; phototropism; hormone cross-talk; miRNA-regulomics; molecular omics

资金

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB) of Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India [SERB/F/4863/2017-2018, SB/S9/Z-13/2019]
  2. SERB
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Tropical Legumes III)
  4. CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals (GLDC)
  5. BBSRC [BB/N010124/1, BB/L010623/1, BB/S018824/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peanut or groundnut is one of the most important legume crops with high protein and oil content. The high nutritional qualities of peanut and its multiple usage have made it an indispensable component of our daily life, in both confectionary and therapeutic food industries. Given the socio-economic significance of peanut, understanding its developmental biology is important in providing a molecular framework to support breeding activities. In peanut, the formation and directional growth of a specialized reproductive organ called a peg, or gynophore, is especially relevant in genetic improvement. Several studies have indicated that peanut yield can be improved by improving reproductive traits including peg development. Therefore, we aim to identify unifying principles for the genetic control, underpinning molecular and physiological basis of peg development for devising appropriate strategy for peg improvement. This review discusses the current understanding of the molecular aspects of peanut peg development citing several studies explaining the key mechanisms. Deciphering and integrating recent transcriptomic, proteomic, and miRNA-regulomic studies provide a new perspective for understanding the regulatory events of peg development that participate in pod formation and thus control yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据