4.6 Article

Oxygen Functional Group Modification of Cellulose-Derived Hard Carbon for Enhanced Sodium Ion Storage

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 22, 页码 18554-18565

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04676

关键词

cellulose; hard carbon; oxygen functional group; mechanochemistry; sodium-ion battery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806050]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Harbin Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen-containing groups in carbon materials have been demonstrated to be effective in the anodic sodium-ion storage process; however, the effect of specific oxygen-containing groups on the sodium-ion storage in the carbon framework remains to be explored. Based on a mechanochemical process (exemplified by ball milling in the presence of dry ice), a selectively modified cellulose-derived hard carbon (BHC-CO2) with a high oxygen content of 19.33 at. % and carboxyl-dominant groups was prepared in this work. The fabricated BHC-CO2 anode exhibits excellent electrochemical performance with a high reversible capacity of 293.5 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 0.05 A g(-1), two times as high as that of the oxygen-deficient BHC-CO2-H-2 anode, demonstrating the significant role of oxygen-containing groups in enhancing the Na+ storage. Moreover, the BHC-CO2 anode has an excellent high-rate cycling stability with a specific capacity of 80.0 mA h g(-1) even after 2000 cycles at 1 A g(-1). Qualitative analyses of capacitive effect combined with density functional theory calculations further reveal that carboxyl groups introduced by the mechanochemical process facilitate Na+ adsorption on the carbon surface, enhancing the capacitive Na+ storage process and thus greatly improving the capacity. This work demonstrates the role of carboxyl on Na+ storage by carbonaceous materials and provides theoretical guidance for the oxygen functional group modification of carbon materials to enhance the sodium-ion storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据