4.6 Article

Molybdenum Oxide Nanosheet-Supported Ferrous Ion Artificial Peroxidase for Visual Colorimetric Detection of Triacetone Triperoxide

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 18985-18991

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04462

关键词

Fe2+ catalyst; artificial peroxidase; visual detection; triacetone triperoxide; MoO3 nanosheet

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705134]
  2. Longshan academic talent research supporting program of SWUST [18LZX204, 17LZX449]
  3. China Academy of Engineering Physics Foundation [18zh005603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The traditional nanozymes have low atom/ion utilization efficiency and are easily influenced by the size, morphology, as well as surface composition of nanomaterials. Herein, we report a template-free and valid approach to prepare a ferrous ion (Fe2+) anchored onto the surface of the MoO3 nanosheet (Fe2+/MoO3) through coordination interaction between Fe2+ and hydroxyl groups of MoO3. The resulting Fe2+/MoO3 shows the peroxidase-like activity, and it can be utilized for catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to generate hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) that oxidize various chromogenic substrates, generating distinct color change and strong ultraviolet-visible absorption. The Fe2+/MoO3 peroxidase mimic exhibits a good thermal stability and works well at a high reaction temperature (95 degrees C) and has higher affinity for substrates than for natural horseradish peroxidase. Theoretical calculation results imply that the strong electrostatic field from the polarization charges between Fe2+ and the MoO3 nanosheet improves the reaction activity, which boosts the generation of (OH)-O-center dot from H2O2. Using the Fe2+/MoO3 peroxidase mimic-involved chromogenic system, we construct visual colorimetric assays for H2O2 and triacetone triperoxide (TATP) explosives, which realize the visual detection of H2O2 and TATP at concentrations of 40 and 60 mu M, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据