4.6 Article

Bioelectrochemical Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms, and Pathways of Chlorophenol Degradation in MFC Using Different Microbial Consortia

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 20, 页码 17263-17272

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04038

关键词

Bioelectrochemical kinetics; Dichlorophenol degradation; Microbial fuel cell; Metabolic pathway; Microbial consortia

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia
  2. University Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a sustainable technology for removing toxic pollutants such as chlorophenols, while generating electricity. Yet, there is lack of detailed study on understanding bioelectrochemical interactions within the complex biological, chemical, and electronic species in MFC system. This paper reports a new research approach to discover bioelectrochemical reaction kinetics, biodegradation pathways, and electrochemical reaction mechanisms of degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) in MFC, which was inoculated with industrial and domestic microbial consortia, referred to as iMFC and dMFC systems, respectively. The chlorophenol degradation was found to contribute electronic transfer and generation in MFC. Microbial growth and degradation kinetic results analyzed by Michaelis-Menten and Hanes-Woolf models showed that MFC is highly capable of degrading 2,4-DCP at high concentration (>30 mg/L). The biodegradation pathways and metabolites varied significantly in iMFC and dMFC under aerobic/anaerobic conditions. The dMFC demonstrated simple and complete degradation pathways, while complex pathways with more nondegraded metabolites were determined in iMFC. A higher biodegradation rate (>60%, V-max = 0.32 mg/L/h and V-max/K-s = 0.03 h(-1)) was achieved in dMFC, producing less toxic acetate as the final product. The iMFC showed excellent microbial growth (similar to 0.5 OD, mu(max) = 0.028 h(-1)) and higher electric outputs (similar to 400 mV) with 3-oxoadipate as its end-product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据