4.6 Article

Is the Hyporheic Zone Relevant beyond the Scientific Community?

期刊

WATER
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w11112230

关键词

hyporheic zone; hyporheic exchange flow; surface water-groundwater exchange; ecosystem services; nutrient turnover; refuge; hyporheos; removal of trace organic compounds; emerging pollutants; self-purification capacity

资金

  1. European Union [641939, 765553, 734317]
  2. German Research Foundation's (DFG) graduate school Urban Water Interfaces [GRK 2032/1]
  3. NERC [NE/P003486/1, NE/L003872/1, NE/I016120/1, NE/R014752/1, NE/N020502/1, NE/I016120/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [734317] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rivers are important ecosystems under continuous anthropogenic stresses. The hyporheic zone is a ubiquitous, reactive interface between the main channel and its surrounding sediments along the river network. We elaborate on the main physical, biological, and biogeochemical drivers and processes within the hyporheic zone that have been studied by multiple scientific disciplines for almost half a century. These previous efforts have shown that the hyporheic zone is a modulator for most metabolic stream processes and serves as a refuge and habitat for a diverse range of aquatic organisms. It also exerts a major control on river water quality by increasing the contact time with reactive environments, which in turn results in retention and transformation of nutrients, trace organic compounds, fine suspended particles, and microplastics, among others. The paper showcases the critical importance of hyporheic zones, both from a scientific and an applied perspective, and their role in ecosystem services to answer the question of the manuscript title. It identifies major research gaps in our understanding of hyporheic processes. In conclusion, we highlight the potential of hyporheic restoration to efficiently manage and reactivate ecosystem functions and services in river corridors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据