4.7 Article

Determination of Aflatoxin B1 and B2 in Vegetable Oils Using Fe3O4/rGO Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Fluorescence with Post-Column Photochemical Derivatization

期刊

TOXINS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins11110621

关键词

aflatoxin; magnetic solid phase extraction; graphene; high-performance liquid chromatography fluorescence; vegetable oil

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0112900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201447, 31601576]
  3. Competitive Planning Project of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2015jzxjh06]
  4. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau [2016C51002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, magnetic graphene nanocomposite Fe3O4/rGO was synthesized by facile one-pot solvothermal method. The nanocomposite was successfully used as magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) adsorbents for the determination of aflatoxins in edible vegetable oils through the pi-pi stacking interactions. MSPE parameters including the amount of adsorbents, extraction and desorption time, washing conditions, and the type and volume of desorption solvent were optimized. Under optimal conditions, good linear relationships were achieved. Limits of detection of this method were as low as 0.02 mu g/kg and 0.01 mu g/kg for aflatoxin B-1 and B-2, respectively. Finally, the magnetic graphene nanocomposite was successfully applied to aflatoxin analysis in vegetable oils. The results indicated that the recoveries of the B-group aflatoxins ranged from 80.4% to 106.0%, whereas the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than 8.1%. Owing to the simplicity, rapidity and efficiency, Fe3O4/rGO magnetic solid phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography fluorescence with post-column photochemical derivatization (Fe3O4/rGO MSPE-HPLC-PCD-FLD) is a promising analytical method for routine and accurate determination of aflatoxins in lipid matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据