4.7 Article

Microstructure and Mechanical/Hydrophilic Features of Agar-Based Films Incorporated with Konjac Glucomannan

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym11121952

关键词

agar-based film; konjac glucomannan; structural features

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801582]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019CFB502]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120708]
  4. Hubei Province Department of Education [Q20181407]
  5. Open Project Program from Guangxi Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Polysaccharide Materials and Modification, Guangxi University for Nationalities [GXPSMM18ZD-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different characterization methods spanning length scales from molecular to micron scale were applied to inspect the microstructures and mechanical/hydrophilic features of agar/konjac glucomannan (KGM) films prepared under different drying temperatures (40 and 60 degrees C). Note that the lower preparation temperature (40 degrees C) could increase the strength and elongation of agar/KGM films at high KGM levels (18:82 wt/wt KGM-agar, or higher). This was related to the variations in the film multi-scale structures with the increment of KGM content: the reduced crystallinity, the increased perfection of nanoscale orders at some KGM amounts, and the negligibly-changed morphology and molecular chemical structure under 40 degrees C preparation temperature. These structural changes initially decreased the film tensile strength, and subsequently increased the film strength and elongation with increasing KGM content. Moreover, under the higher drying temperature (60 degrees C), the increased KGM content could concurrently reduce the strength and elongation for the films, associated with probable phase separations on nano and smaller scales. In addition, the increased KGM amount tended to make the film more hydrophilic, whereas the changes in the film structures did not dominantly affect the changing trend of hydrophilicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据