4.4 Article

Peripheral nerve injury-induced alterations in VTA neuron firing properties

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13041-019-0511-y

关键词

Dopamine; Ventral tegmental area; Pain; Prefrontal cortex; Brain circuits

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Canada-Israel Health Research Initiative - Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Canada-Israel Health Research Initiative - Israel Science Foundation
  4. Canada-Israel Health Research Initiative - International Development Research Centre
  5. Canada-Israel Health Research Initiative - Azrieli Foundation
  6. Alberta Innovates
  7. University of Calgary Eyes High program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ventral tegmental area (VTA) is one of the main brain regions harboring dopaminergic (DA) neurons, and plays important roles in reinforcement and motivation. Recent studies have indicated that DA neurons not only respond to rewarding stimuli, but also to noxious stimuli. Furthermore, VTA DA neurons undergo plasticity during chronic pain. Lateral and medial VTA neurons project to different brain areas, and have been characterized via their distinct electrophysiological properties. In this study, we characterized electrophysiological properties of lateral and medial VTA DA neurons using DAT-cre reporter mice, and examined their plasticity during neuropathic pain states. We observed various DA subpopulations in both the lateral and medial VTA, as defined by action potential firing patterns, independently of synaptic inputs. Our results demonstrated that lateral and medial VTA DA neurons undergo differential plasticity after peripheral nerve injury that leads to neuropathic pain. However, these changes only reside in specific DA subpopulations. This study suggests that lateral and medial VTA DA neurons are differentially affected during neuropathic pain conditions, and emphasizes the importance of subpopulation specificity when targeting VTA DA neurons for treatment of neuropathic pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据