4.5 Article

Quantitative Interpretation of FRET Experiments via Molecular Simulation: Force Field and Validation

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 108, 期 11, 页码 2721-2731

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.038

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular simulation is a valuable and complementary tool that may assist with the interpretation of single-molecule Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments, if the energy function is of sufficiently high quality. Here we present force-field parameters for one of the most common pairs of chromophores used in experiments, AlexaFluor 488 and 594. From microsecond molecular-dynamics simulations, we are able to recover both experimentally determined equilibrium constants and association/dissociation rates of the chromophores with free tryptophan, as well as the decay of fluorescence anisotropy of a labeled protein. We find that it is particularly important to obtain a correct balance of solute-water interactions in the simulations in order to faithfully capture the experimental anisotropy decays, which provide a sensitive benchmark for fluorophore mobility. Lastly, by a combination of experiment and simulation, we address a potential complication in the interpretation of experiments on polyproline, used as a molecular ruler for FRET experiments, namely the potential association of one of the chromophores with the polyproline helix. Under conditions where simulations accurately capture the fluorescence anisotropy decay, we find at most a modest, transient population of conformations in which the chromophores associate with the polyproline. Explicit calculation of FRET transfer efficiencies for short polyprolines yields results in good agreement with experiment. These results illustrate the potential power of a combination of molecular simulation and experiment in quantifying biomolecular dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据