4.8 Article

Reduction of Global H3K27me3 Enhances HER2/ErbB2 Targeted Therapy

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 249-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.105

关键词

-

资金

  1. Terry Fox Research Institute Program [1048]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation award [FDN-148373]
  3. Canadian Epigenetics, Environment and Health Research Consortium Team grant [TEC-128089]
  4. Canada Research Chair in Molecular Oncology [950-231033]
  5. U.S. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Breast Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-11-1-0046]
  6. McGill Integrated Cancer Research Training Program
  7. Systems Biology Program of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  8. Reseau de Recherche en Cancer of the FRQS [FRQ-34787]
  9. Stand Up To Cancer Canada and the Canadian Cancer Society [SU2C-AACR-DT-1815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2/HER2, such as Trastuzumab, are the standard of care therapy for breast cancers driven by ERBB2 overexpression and activation. However, a substantial proportion of patients exhibit de novo resistance. Here, by comparing matched Trastuzumab-naive and posttreatment patient samples from a neoadjuvant trial, we link resistance with elevation of H3K27me(3), a repressive histone modification catalyzed by polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2). In ErbB2+ breast cancer models, PRC2 silences endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) to suppress anti-tumor type-I interferon (IFN) responses. In patients, elevated H3K27me(3) in tumor cells following Trastuzumab treatment correlates with suppression of interferon-driven viral defense gene expression signatures and poor response. Using an immunocompetent model, we provide evidence that EZH2 inhibitors promote interferon-driven immune responses that enhance the efficacy of anti-ErbB2 mAbs, suggesting the potential clinical benefit of epigenomic reprogramming by H3K27m(e)3 depletion in Trastuzumab-resistant disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据