4.5 Article

The effect of environmental regulations on air quality: A long-term trend analysis of SO2 and NO2 in the largest urban agglomeration in southwest China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 2030-2039

出版社

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2019.09.011

关键词

Sulfur dioxide; Nitrogen dioxide; Long-term trend; Urban agglomeration; Southwest China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41905126, 41875169]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Project [2018SZ0316, 2019JDKP0046]
  3. Chengdu Science and Technology Anti-haze Project [2018-ZM01-00038-SN]
  4. Chengdu Science and Technology Benefit Project [2016-MH01-00038-SF]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of CUIT [KYTZ201601]
  6. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) play important roles in regional air quality and global climate change. In this study, the long-term trends in SO2 and NO2 concentrations in the Chengdu Plain urban agglomeration (CDPUA) of the Sichuan Basin, Southwest China, were investigated from 2008 to 2018. The annual mean concentrations of SO2 showed a substantial decrease over the CDPUA from 2008 to 2018. The cities of Mianyang, Deyang, Ziyang, and Leshan exhibited similar NO2 variations, with a slight increase from 2008 to 2013, then decrease to 2018. The decrease in SO2 from 2008 to 2018 in the CDPUA reflects the success of China's SO2 emissions reduction program after the Chinese national 11 th Five-year Plan (2005-2010). The fluctuations in the NO2 concentrations imply that NO2 emissions reduction in the CDPUA was not successful during the 11th Five-year Plan, and the non-obvious decrease in NO2 after the 12th Five-year Plan (2011-2016) also indicates the lack of effective NOx control methods. Routine meteorological parameters also have an influence on air pollutant concentrations, and the influence of the relative humidity shows significant local differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据