4.7 Article

Analysis of the TCR Repertoire in HIV-Exposed but Uninfected Infants

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48434-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P20-GM104317]
  2. NSF EPSCoR [EPS-1004057]
  3. NIH [K24 HD054314]
  4. University of Washington (UW) AIDS International Training and Research Program - NIH Fogarty International Center grant [D43 TW00007]
  5. UW Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI 027757]
  6. NIH institutes and centers: NIAID
  7. NIMH
  8. NICHD
  9. NHLBI
  10. NCCAM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been shown to leave profound and lasting impacts on the HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infant, including increased mortality and morbidity, immunological changes, and developmental delays compared to their HIV-unexposed (HU) counterparts. Exposure to HIV or antiretroviral therapy may influence immune development, which could increase morbidity and mortality. However, a direct link between the increased mortality and morbidity and the infant's immune system has not been identified. To provide a global picture of the neonatal T cell repertoire in HEU versus HU infants, the diversity of the T cell receptor beta chain (TRB) expressed in cord blood samples from HEU infants was determined using next-generation sequencing and compared to healthy (HU) infants collected from the same community. While the TRB repertoire of HU infants was broadly diverse, in line with the expected idea of a naive T cell repertoire, samples of HEU infants showed a significantly reduced TRB diversity. This study is the first to demonstrate differences in TRB diversity between HEU and HU cord blood samples and provides evidence that maternal HIV, in the absence of transmission, influences the adaptive immune system of the unborn child.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据