4.7 Article

The balance between NRF2/GSH antioxidant mediated pathway and DNA repair modulates cisplatin resistance in lung cancer cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54065-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil) [2013/08028-1, 2014/15982-6, 2015/15184-5, 2017/24217-0]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brasilia, Brazil) [001]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil) [304270/2013-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer patients face a dismal prognosis mainly due to the low efficacy of current available treatments. Cisplatin is the first-line chemotherapy treatment for those patients, however, resistance to this drug is a common and yet not fully understood phenomenon. Aiming to shed new light into this puzzle, we used established normal and malignant lung cell lines displaying different sensitivity towards cisplatin treatment. We observed a negative correlation between cell viability and DNA damage induction upon cisplatin treatment. Interestingly, drug sensitivity in those cell lines was not due to either difference on DNA repair capacity, or in the amount of membrane ion channel commonly used for cisplatin uptake. Also, we noted that glutathione intracellular levels, and expression and activity of the transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) were determinant for cisplatin cytotoxicity. Remarkably, analysis of gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients of the TCGA data bank revealed that there is a significant lower overall survival rate in the subset of patients bearing tumors with unbalanced levels of NRF2/KEAP1 and, as consequence, increased expression of NRF2 target genes. Thus, the results indicate that NRF2 and glutathione levels figure as important cisplatin resistance biomarkers in lung cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据