4.7 Article

Large and tunable magnetocaloric effect in gadolinium-organic framework: tuning by solvent exchange

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51590-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. VEGA [1/0745/17]
  2. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-15-0520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic properties of three variants of MOF-76(Gd), {[Gd(BTC)(H2O)]center dot G}(n) (BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate, G = guest molecules) were investigated by static susceptibility, isothermal magnetization and specific heat capacity measurements. In the study we used as synthesized MOF-76(Gd)-DMF (1) (G = DMF = dimethylformamide), containing DMF molecules in the cavity system, compound MOF-76(Gd) (2), activated complex without solvents in the cavities and water exchanged sample MOF-76(Gd)-H2O (3). A pronounced change in the magnetic entropy was found near the critical temperature for all three compounds. It was shown, that magnetic entropy change depends on the solvatation of the MOF. The highest value entropy change,Delta S-Mpk(T) was observed for compound 2 (Delta S-Mpk(T) = 42 J kg(-1) K-1 at 1.8 K for Delta H = 5 T). The Delta S-Mpk(T) for the compounds 1, 2 and 3 reached 81.8, 88.4 and 100% of the theoretical values, respectively. This suggests that in compound 3 Gd3+center dot center dot center dot Gd3+ antiferromagnetic interactions are decoupled gradually, and higher fields promote a larger decoupling between the individual spin centers. The observed entropy changes of compounds were comparable with other magnetic refrigerants proposed for low-temperature applications. To study the magnetothermal effect of 2 (the sample with largest -Delta S-Mpk), the temperature-dependent heat capacities (C) at different fields were measured. The value of magnetic entropy S obtained from heat capacities (39.5 J kg(-1) K-1 at 1.8 K for an applied magnetic field change of 5T) was in good agreement with that derived from the magnetization data (42 J kg(-1) K-1 at 1.8 K).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据