4.7 Article

A FAM83A Positive Feed-back Loop Drives Survival and Tumorigenicity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49475-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health R21 award [R21CA178651]
  2. Athymic Animal and Xenograft core of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  3. Cytometry and Imaging Microscopy core of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  4. Small Animal Imaging and Research core of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  5. Genomics core facility of the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine's Genetics and Genome Sciences Department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are deadly on account of the delay in diagnosis and dearth of effective treatment options for advanced disease. The insurmountable hurdle of targeting oncogene KRAS, the most prevalent genetic mutation in PDAC, has delayed the availability of targeted therapy for PDAC patients. An alternate approach is to target other tumour-exclusive effector proteins important in RAS signalling. The Family with Sequence Similarity 83 (FAM83) proteins are oncogenic, tumour-exclusive and function similarly to RAS, by driving the activation of PI3K and MAPK signalling. In this study we show that FAM83A expression is significantly elevated in human and murine pancreatic cancers and is essential for the growth and tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer cells. Elevated FAM83A expression maintains essential MEK/ERK survival signalling, preventing cell death in pancreatic cancer cells. Moreover, we identified a positive feed-forward loop mediated by the MEK/ERK-activated AP-1 transcription factors, JUNB and FOSB, which is responsible for the elevated expression of oncogenic FAM83A. Our data indicates that targeting the MEK/ERK-FAM83A feed-forward loop opens up additional avenues for clinical therapy that bypass targeting of oncogenic KRAS in aggressive pancreatic cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据