4.7 Article

Sex-specific up-regulation of lncRNAs in peripheral blood of patients with schizophrenia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49265-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia as a common disabling psychiatric disorder has been associated with dysregulation of several genes and pathways among them are those being regulated by long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Based on the acknowledged roles of lncRNAs in neurodevelopment, in the current study, we assessed expression of six lncRNAs namely HOXA-AS2, Linc-ROR, MALAT1, MEG3, SPRY4-IT1 and UCA1 in peripheral blood of 60 patients with schizophrenia and 60 healthy subjects. HOXA-AS2, Linc-ROR, MEG3, SPRY4-IT1 and UCA1 levels were significantly higher in total patients compared with total controls. However, when evaluating expression of genes in sex-based subgroups, the differences in the expression of these lncRNAs were significant only among females. Assessment of partial correlation between expression of lncRNAs and age of study participants after controlling the effect of sex, revealed significant correlations for HOXA-AS2, MALAT1 and UCA1 in both patients and controls. Besides, expressions of Linc-ROR and SPRY4-IT1 were correlated with age only in patients. Significant pairwise correlations were recognized between expression levels of lncRNAs in both patients with schizophrenia and controls. Based on the area under curve (AUC) values, SPRY4-IT1 had the best performance in differentiation of female patients with schizophrenia from female controls (AUC = 0.85, P < 0.0001). Combination of Linc-ROR, MEG3, SPRY4-IT1 and UCA1 expression levels could differentiate female patients with 95.2% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity and diagnostic power of 0.88 (P < 0.0001). The current study suggests the presence of a sex-based dysregulation of lncRNAs in patients with schizophrenia and their possible application as diagnostic biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据