4.7 Article

Experimental validation of force inference in epithelia from cell to tissue scale

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50690-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. LabEx INFORM [ANR-11-LABX-0054]
  2. A*MIDEX project - the Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  3. ANR [ANR-17-CE13-0032]
  4. French National Research Agency [ANR-10-INBS-04-01]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE13-0032] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphogenesis relies on the active generation of forces, and the transmission of these forces to surrounding cells and tissues. Hence measuring forces directly in developing embryos is an essential task to study the mechanics of development. Among the experimental techniques that have emerged to measure forces in epithelial tissues, force inference is particularly appealing. Indeed it only requires a snapshot of the tissue, as it relies on the topology and geometry of cell contacts, assuming that forces are balanced at each vertex. However, establishing force inference as a reliable technique requires thorough validation in multiple conditions. Here we performed systematic comparisons of force inference with laser ablation experiments in four epithelial tissues from two animals, the fruit fly and the quail. We show that force inference accurately predicts single junction tension, tension patterns in stereotyped groups of cells, and tissue-scale stress patterns, in wild type and mutant conditions. We emphasize its ability to capture the distribution of forces at different scales from a single image, which gives it a critical advantage over perturbative techniques such as laser ablation. Overall, our results demonstrate that force inference is a reliable and efficient method to quantify the mechanical state of epithelia during morphogenesis, especially at larger scales when inferred tensions and pressures are binned into a coarse-grained stress tensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据