4.6 Article

Polarized Catalytic Polymer Nanofibers

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12182859

关键词

electrospinning; polarization; heterogenous catalysis; PVDF; phenol; cyclohexanone

资金

  1. Jazan University, Saudi Arabia
  2. Ahlstrom
  3. Bekaert
  4. Cummins Filtration
  5. Donaldson
  6. Hollingsworth
  7. Vose
  8. Parker Hannifin Corporation
  9. SNS Nanofiber Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular scale modifications were achieved by spontaneous polarization which is favored in enhancements of beta-crystallization phase inside polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers (NFs). These improvements were much more effective in nano and submicron fibers compared to fibers with relatively larger diameters. Metallic nanoparticles (NPs) supported by nanofibrous membranes opened new vistas in filtration, catalysis, and serving as most reliable resources in numerous other industrial applications. In this research, hydrogenation of phenol was studied as a model to test the effectiveness of polarized PVDF nanofiber support embedded with agglomerated palladium (Pd) metallic nanoparticle diameters ranging from 5-50 nm supported on polymeric PVDF NFs with similar to 200 nm in cross-sectional diameters. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and other analytical analysis revealed both molecular and surface morphological changes associated with polarization treatment. The results showed that the fibers mats heated to their curie temperature (150 degrees C) increased the catalytic activity and decreased the selectivity by yielding substantial amounts of undesired product (cyclohexanol) alongside with the desired product (cyclohexanone). Over 95% phenol conversion with excellent cyclohexanone selectivity was obtained less than nine hours of reaction using the polarized PVDF nanofibers as catalytic support structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据