4.6 Article

Comparison of Vacancy Sink Efficiency of Cu/V and Cu/Nb Interfaces by the Shared Cu Layer

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12162628

关键词

radiation damage; sink efficiency; multilayer composite; interface; vacancy

资金

  1. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Energy Research Project from Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015GB121004, 2017YFE0302500, 2018YFE0307100]
  2. National Natural Science and Foundation of China (NSFC) [11975034, 11921006, 11375018, 11528508]
  3. China-Romania Science and Technology Cooperation Committee 43rd Regular Meeting Exchange Program
  4. Ion Beam Materials Lab at Peking University
  5. Instrumental Analysis Fund of Peking University
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a new method to compare and then reveal the vacancy sink efficiencies quantitively between different hetero-interfaces with a shared Cu layer in one sample, in contrast to previous studies, which have compared the vacancy sink efficiencies of interfaces in different samples. Cu-Nb-Cu-V nanoscale metallic multilayer composites (NMMCs) containing Cu/V and Cu/Nb interfaces periodically were prepared as research samples and bombarded with helium ions to create vacancies which were filled by helium bubbles. A special Cu layer shared by adjoining Cu/V and Cu/Nb interfaces exists, in which the implanted helium concentration reaches its maximum and remains nearly constant with a well-designed incident energy. The results show that bubble-denuded zones (BDZ) close to interfaces exist, and that the width of the BDZ close to the Cu/V interface is less than that of Cu/Nb interface. This result is explained by one-dimensional diffusion theory, and the ratio of vacancy sink efficiency between Cu/V and Cu/Nb interfaces is calculated. Conclusively, Cu/Nb interfaces are more efficient than Cu/V interfaces in eliminating vacancies induced by radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据