4.2 Article

Organic Matter Dynamics in a Tropical Gallery Forest in a Grassland Landscape

期刊

BIOTROPICA
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 301-310

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12308

关键词

ATP; fungi; leaf litter breakdown; litterfall; shredders; sporulation; vereda

类别

资金

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/INPA) [480298/2008-4]
  2. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CT-Hidro/Climatic Changes/Water Resources/CNPq) [403949/2013-0]
  3. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development [151375/2014-3]
  4. Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG) [APQ-2051-5.03/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high biodiversity of tropical forest streams depends on the strong input of organic matter, yet the leaf litter decomposition dynamics in these streams are not well understood. We assessed how seasonal litterfall affects leaf litter breakdown, density and biomass of aquatic invertebrates, and the microbial biomass and sporulation of aquatic hyphomycetes in a South American grassland 'vereda' landscape. Although litter production in the riparian area was low, leaf litter breakdown was high compared with other South American systems, with maximum values coinciding with the rainy season. Fungal biomass in decomposing leaves was high, but spore densities in water and sporulation rates were very low. Invertebrates were not abundant in litter bags, suggesting they play a minor role in leaf litter decomposition. Chironomids accounted for similar to 70 percent of all invertebrates; only 10 percent of non-Chironomidae invertebrates were shredders. Therefore, fungi appear to be the drivers of leaf litter decomposition. Our results show that despite low productivity and relatively fast litter decomposition, organic matter accumulated in the stream and riparian area. This pattern was attributed to the wet/dry cycles in which leaves falling in the flat riparian zone remain undecomposed (during the dry period) and are massively transported to the riverbed (rainy season).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据