4.8 Article

Understanding Ostwald Ripening and Surface Charging Effects in Solvothermally-Prepared Metal Oxide-Carbon Anodes for High Performance Rechargeable Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201902194

关键词

charging effects; lithium batteries; metal oxides; Ostwald ripening; solvothermal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978281, 21975250]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [SQ2017YFE9128100]
  3. Independent Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resources Utilization, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [110005R086]
  4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal oxides synthesized by the solvothermal approach have widespread applications, while their nanostructure control remains challenging because their reaction mechanism is still not fully understood. Herein, it is demonstrated how the competitive relation between Ostwald ripening and surface charging during solvothermal synthesis is crucial to engineering high-quality metal (oxide)-carbon nanomaterials. Using SnO2 as a case study, a new type of hollow SnO2-C hybrid nanoparticles is synthesized consisting of core-shell structured SnO2@C nanodots (which has not been previously reported). This new anode material exhibits extremely high lithium storage capacity of 1225 and 955 mAh g(-1) at 200 and 500 mA g(-1), respectively, and excellent cycling stability. In addition, full-battery cells are constructed combining SnO2-C anode with Ni-rich cathode, which can be charged to a higher voltage compared to commercial graphite anode and still demonstrate extraordinary rate performance. This study provides significant insight into the largely unexplored reaction mechanism during solvothermal synthesis, and demonstrates how such understanding can be used to achieve high-performance metal (oxide)-C anodes for rechargeable batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据