4.8 Article

Genome-wide association and epidemiological analyses reveal common genetic origins between uterine leiomyomata and endometriosis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12536-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD060530]
  2. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Academy of Finland [295693]
  4. Orion Research Foundation
  5. NIH [K22 CA193860]
  6. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship Scheme [1103623]
  8. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA06516]
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [295693, 295693] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  10. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1103623] Funding Source: NHMRC
  11. MRC [MC_UU_12015/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uterine leiomyomata (UL) are the most common neoplasms of the female reproductive tract and primary cause for hysterectomy, leading to considerable morbidity and high economic burden. Here we conduct a GWAS meta-analysis in 35,474 cases and 267,505 female controls of European ancestry, identifying eight novel genome-wide significant (P < 5 x 10(-8)) loci, in addition to confirming 21 previously reported loci, including multiple independent signals at 10 loci. Phenotypic stratification of UL by heavy menstrual bleeding in 3409 cases and 199,171 female controls reveals genome-wide significant associations at three of the 29 UL loci: 5p15.33 (TERT), 5q35.2 (FGFR4) and 11q22.3 (ATM). Four loci identified in the meta-analysis are also associated with endometriosis risk; an epidemiological meta-analysis across 402,868 women suggests at least a doubling of risk for UL diagnosis among those with a history of endometriosis. These findings increase our understanding of genetic contribution and biology underlying UL development, and suggest overlapping genetic origins with endometriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据