4.8 Article

Transcriptomic profiling of the myeloma bone-lining niche reveals BMP signalling inhibition to improve bone disease

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12296-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. ASH Travel Grant
  2. UK Myeloma Forum travel award
  3. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Wellcome Trust [102341/Z/13/Z]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/L006340/1]
  6. Bloodwise
  7. Orthopaedic Research UK
  8. European Union Seventh Framework Programme Marie Curie Career Integration Grant
  9. Arthritis Research UK [20631, MP/19200]
  10. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM121499]
  11. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  12. Wellcome Trust [102341/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  13. MRC [G84/6443, MC_PC_15065, MC_UU_12009/16, MC_UU_12010/10, MR/L006340/1, MC_UU_00008/10] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple myeloma is an incurable, bone marrow-dwelling malignancy that disrupts bone homeostasis causing skeletal damage and pain. Mechanisms underlying myeloma-induced bone destruction are poorly understood and current therapies do not restore lost bone mass. Using transcriptomic profiling of isolated bone lining cell subtypes from a murine myeloma model, we find that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling is upregulated in stromal progenitor cells. BMP signalling has not previously been reported to be dysregulated in myeloma bone disease. Inhibition of BMP signalling in vivo using either a small molecule BMP receptor antagonist or a solubilized BMPR1a-FC receptor ligand trap prevents trabecular and cortical bone volume loss caused by myeloma, without increasing tumour burden. BMP inhibition directly reduces osteoclastogenesis, increases osteoblasts and bone formation, and suppresses bone marrow sclerostin levels. In summary we describe a novel role for the BMP pathway in myeloma-induced bone disease that can be therapeutically targeted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据