4.8 Article

CD36 inhibits β-catenin/c-myc-mediated glycolysis through ubiquitination of GPC4 to repress colorectal tumorigenesis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11662-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672992, 31601023, 81872470]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2015A030306015]
  3. Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province [2014J2200015]
  4. Excellent Young Teachers Program of Higher Education of Guangdong Province [YQ2015036]
  5. Guangdong Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals [2015TQ01R279]
  6. Foundation of President of the Nanfang Hospital [2015C020]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2016A030310387, 2017A030313154, 2017A030313588, 2018A030313547]
  8. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [A2016237]
  9. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China [201707010214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diverse expression pattern of CD36 reflects its multiple cellular functions. However, the roles of CD36 in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unknown. Here, we discover that CD36 expression is progressively decreased from adenomas to carcinomas. CD36 loss predicts poor survival of CRC patients. In CRC cells, CD36 acts as a tumor suppressor and inhibits aerobic glycolysis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanically, CD36-Glypcian 4 (GPC4) interaction could promote the proteasome-dependent ubiquitination of GPC4, followed by inhibition of beta-catenin/c-myc signaling and suppression of downstream glycolytic target genes GLUT1, HK2, PKM2 and LDHA. Moreover, disruption of CD36 in inflammation-induced CRC model as well as Apc(Min/+) mice model significantly increased colorectal tumorigenesis. Our results reveal a CD36-GPC4-beta-catenin-c-myc signaling axis that regulates glycolysis in CRC development and may provide an intervention strategy for CRC prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据