4.8 Article

Anatomy and function of the vertebral column lymphatic network in mice

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12568-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Agence Nationale Recherche [ANR-17-CE14-0005-03]
  3. ederation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau (FRC 2017)
  4. Carnot Maturation
  5. Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network of Excellence (ATTRACT)
  6. NIH [R01EB016629-01, NHLBI 1R01HLI125811, NEI 1R01EY025979-01, P30 EY026878]
  7. Yale School of Medicine
  8. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  9. European Research Council (European Union) [743155]
  10. Wihuri Foundation
  11. Academy of Finland (Centre of Excellence Program 2014-2019) [271845, 307366]
  12. Finnish Brain Foundation
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [743155] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cranial lymphatic vessels (LVs) are involved in the transport of fluids, macromolecules and central nervous system (CNS) immune responses. Little information about spinal LVs is available, because these delicate structures are embedded within vertebral tissues and difficult to visualize using traditional histology. Here we show an extended vertebral column LV network using three-dimensional imaging of decalcified iDISCO(+)-clarified spine segments. Vertebral LVs connect to peripheral sensory and sympathetic ganglia and form metameric vertebral circuits connecting to lymph nodes and the thoracic duct. They drain the epidural space and the dura mater around the spinal cord and associate with leukocytes. Vertebral LVs remodel extensively after spinal cord injury and VEGF-C-induced vertebral lymphangiogenesis exacerbates the inflammatory responses, T cell infiltration and demyelination following focal spinal cord lesion. Therefore, vertebral LVs add to skull meningeal LVs as gatekeepers of CNS immunity and may be potential targets to improve the maintenance and repair of spinal tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据