4.8 Article

In vivo engineered extracellular matrix scaffolds with instructive niches for oriented tissue regeneration

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12545-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1103500]
  2. Innovative Research Group Project [81921004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81972063, 81530059, 81772000, 81601625]
  4. NSFC Fellowship Fund for International Young Scientists [81850410552]
  5. Science and Technology Support Program of Tianjin [16YFZCSY01020]
  6. National Science Foundation (NSF-DMR award) [1508511]
  7. NIAMS [1R01AR067859]
  8. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Implanted scaffolds with inductive niches can facilitate the recruitment and differentiation of host cells, thereby enhancing endogenous tissue regeneration. Extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds derived from cultured cells or natural tissues exhibit superior biocompatibility and trigger favourable immune responses. However, the lack of hierarchical porous structure fails to provide cells with guidance cues for directional migration and spatial organization, and consequently limit the morpho-functional integration for oriented tissues. Here, we engineer ECM scaffolds with parallel microchannels (ECM-C) by subcutaneous implantation of sacrificial templates, followed by template removal and decellularization. The advantages of such ECM-C scaffolds are evidenced by close regulation of in vitro cell activities, and enhanced cell infiltration and vascularization upon in vivo implantation. We demonstrate the versatility and flexibility of these scaffolds by regenerating vascularized and innervated neo-muscle, vascularized neo-nerve and pulsatile neo-artery with functional integration. This strategy has potential to yield inducible biomaterials with applications across tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据