4.8 Article

MYC paralog-dependent apoptotic priming orchestrates a spectrum of vulnerabilities in small cell lung cancer

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11371-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH NCI [R01CA187487, R21CA216504]
  2. American Lung Association [LCD-506758]
  3. Huntsman Cancer Institute from the NIH NCI [P30CA042014]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CRC1399, KFO-286/RP2, RE 2246/2-1, RE 2246/7-1, TH1386/3-1]
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [e:Med 01ZX1603A, 01ZX1406]
  6. German federal state North Rhine Westphalia (NRW), EFRE initiative [EFRE-0800397]
  7. Else KronerFresenius Stiftung [2018_EKMS.35, EKFS-2014-A06, 2016_ Kolleg.19]
  8. Koln Fortune program
  9. Deutsche Krebshilfe [70113041, 70112888, 70113129]
  10. Deutsche Krebshilfe as part of the Oncology Centers of Excellence funding program
  11. Small Cell Lung Cancer Genome Sequencing Consortium [109679]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MYC paralogs are frequently activated in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) but represent poor drug targets. Thus, a detailed mapping of MYC-paralog-specific vulnerabilities may help to develop effective therapies for SCLC patients. Using a unique cellular CRISPR activation model, we uncover that, in contrast to MYCN and MYCL, MYC represses BCL2 transcription via interaction with MIZ1 and DNMT3a. The resulting lack of BCL2 expression promotes sensitivity to cell cycle control inhibition and dependency on MCL1. Furthermore, MYC activation leads to heightened apoptotic priming, intrinsic genotoxic stress and susceptibility to DNA damage checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, combined AURK and CHK1 inhibition substantially prolongs the survival of mice bearing MYC-driven SCLC beyond that of combination chemotherapy. These analyses uncover MYC-paralog-specific regulation of the apoptotic machinery with implications for genotype-based selection of targeted therapeutics in SCLC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据