4.4 Article

Increased expression of type 2 innate lymphoid cells in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 735-740

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8235

关键词

allergic rhinitis; type 2 innate lymphoid cells; house dust mite; flow cytometry

资金

  1. Project National Natural Science Foundation Project [81500776]
  2. Fundamental and Advanced Research Program of Chongqing [cstc2015jcyjA10103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are a newly identified group of innate immune cells. ILC2s promote features of allergic airway diseases through the secretion of Th2 type cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13. It remains unknown whether ILC2s aggregate in the peripheral blood. The present study examined the ILC2 levels in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), and the correlation with the severity of clinical symptoms. Flow cytometry detected the ILC2s frequency in the peripheral blood of 12 healthy controls (HCs), 12 patients with AR sensitized only to house dust mites (HDM-AR), and 18 AR patients monosensitized to other antigens including weeds, animal danders and Blattella germanica, but not including HDM (non-HDM-AR). Clinical symptoms of AR were expressed according to the Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS). The percentages of ILC2s in the peripheral blood were increased significantly in patients with HDM-AR and non-HDM-AR, compared with that in the HCs. A subgroup analysis of patients with AR indicated that the proportion of ILC2s was significantly increased in HDM-AR in comparison with that in non-HDM AR. Furthermore, there was a notable correlation between ILC2 levels and T5SS scores. ILC2s frequencies in PBMC were increased significantly in pediatric patients with AR, irrespective of the type of allergen. HDM may trigger more severe allergic reactions and an increase in the number of ILC2s. These discoveries indicate the unique function of ILC2 in AR and provide a potential therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据