4.6 Article

Capsular Polysaccharide Is a Receptor of a Clostridium perfringens Bacteriophage CPS1

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v11111002

关键词

bacteriophage; Clostridium perfringens; phage receptor; capsular polysaccharides

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - MSIP, Republic of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2A1A17069378]
  2. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry (IPET) through the Agriculture, Food and Rural A ffairs Research Center Support Program - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) [710012-03-1-SB110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clostridium perfringens is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, and spore forming bacterium that is widely distributed in the environment and one of the most common causes of foodborne illnesses. Bacteriophages are regarded as one of the most promising alternatives to antibiotics in controlling antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Here we isolated a virulent C. perfringens phage, CPS1, and analysis of its whole genome and morphology revealed a small genome (19 kbps) and a short noncontractile tail, suggesting that CPS1 can be classified as a member of Picovirinae, a subfamily of Podoviridae. To determine the host receptor of CPS1, the EZ-Tn5 random transposon mutant library of C. perfringens ATCC 13124 was constructed and screened for resistance to CPS1 infection. Analysis of the CPS1-resistant mutants revealed that the CPF_0486 was disrupted by Tn5. The CPF_0486 was annotated as galE, a gene encoding UDP-glucose 4-epimerase (GalE). However, biochemical analyses demonstrated that the encoded protein possessed dual activities of GalE and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4-epimerase (Gne). We found that the CPF_0486::Tn5 mutant produced a reduced amount of capsular polysaccharides (CPS) compared with the wild type. We also discovered that glucosamine and galactosamine could competitively inhibit host adsorption of CPS1. These results suggest that CPS acts as a receptor for this phage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据