4.1 Article

Crop signal markers facilitate crop detection and weed removal from lettuce and tomato by an intelligent cultivator

期刊

WEED TECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 342-350

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/wet.2019.120

关键词

crop marking; intelligent cultivation; robotic weeding; vegetable crops; weed-crop differentiation

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Research Initiative [USDA-NIFA-SCRI-004530]
  2. California Tomato Research Institute
  3. California Leafy Greens Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing weed control costs and limited herbicide options threaten vegetable crop profitability. Traditional interrow mechanical cultivation is very effective at removing weeds between crop rows. However, weed control within the crop rows is necessary to establish the crop and prevent yield loss. Currently, many vegetable crops require hand weeding to remove weeds within the row that remain after traditional cultivation and herbicide use. Intelligent cultivators have come into commercial use to remove intrarow weeds and reduce cost of hand weeding. Intelligent cultivators currently on the market such as the Robovator, use pattern recognition to detect the crop row. These cultivators do not differentiate crops and weeds and do not work well among high weed populations. One approach to differentiate weeds is to place a machine-detectable mark or signal on the crop (i.e., the crop has the mark and the weed does not), thereby facilitating weed/crop differentiation. Lettuce and tomato plants were marked with labels and topical markers, then cultivated with an intelligent cultivator programmed to identify the markers. Results from field trials in marked tomato and lettuce found that the intelligent cultivator removed 90% more weeds from tomato and 66% more weeds from lettuce than standard cultivators without reducing yields. Accurate crop and weed differentiation described here resulted in a 45% to 48% reduction in hand-weeding time per hectare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据