4.7 Article

Deforestation Effects on Rainfall-Induced Shallow Landslides: Remote Sensing and Physically-Based Modelling

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 9962-9976

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025233

关键词

Landslide; Remote Sensing; Modeling; Rainfall

资金

  1. Competence Centre for Environment and Sustainability (CCES)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deforestation of steep slopes may temporarily reduce evapotranspiration and lessen root reinforcement thus potentially enhancing landslide susceptibility. Quantifying the effects of deforestation and associated perturbations on landslide characteristics remains a challenge, especially for predictions in remote areas with limited information. We applied the STEP-TRAMM model that uses publicly available climatic and landscape information to assess effects of forest alteration on hydro-mechanical processes. The model considers two types of forest alterations: (i) removal of root reinforcement following permanent forest conversion, and (ii) time dependent root decay and regrowth following clear-cut timber harvesting. The model was applied to four study areas in different climatic regions (New Zealand, Oregon, Sumatra and Cambodia). We compared model predictions of landslide metrics with satellite-imaging of landslides following deforestation. Although we observe a higher propensity and larger landslides in deforested areas, effects were sensitive to deforestation practices and patterns. The largest increase in landslide area was associated with large and interconnected deforested tracts within a few years after deforestation as determined by competition between root decay and forest regrowth. For patchy small-scale forest conversion, the landslide areas were smaller but could occur many years after deforestation (> 10 years). The modeling framework offers ability to evaluate forest alteration scenarios through their potential impact on landslide hazard in specific regions of the landscape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据