4.3 Article

Impact of Mycobacterium bovis-induced pathology on interpretation of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold assay results in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2019.109923

关键词

African buffalo; Interferon gamma; Interferon gamma-inducible protein 10; QuantiFERON (R)-TB Gold; Mycobacterium bovis; Pathology

资金

  1. Harry Crossley Foundation
  2. South African government through the South African Medical Research Council
  3. National Research Foundation South African Research Chair Initiative [86949]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytokine interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) is a sensitive biomarker of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer). However, elevated levels of IP-10 in QuantiFERON (R)-TB Gold (QFT) unstimulated whole blood compromises the utility of this biomarker. In this study, IP-10 and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) concentrations in whole blood samples from M. bovis culture-confirmed buffaloes with varying degrees of pathological changes (n = 72) and uninfected controls (n = 70) were measured in the IP-10 release assay (IPRA) and IFN-gamma release assay (IGRA), respectively. Findings suggest that concentrations of both cytokines in QFT Nil tubes were higher in infected buffaloes with macroscopic pathological changes consistent with bovine tuberculosis compared to uninfected controls, and IGRA values increased with more severe pathological changes in infected buffaloes (p < 0.05). Finally, in culture-confirmed buffaloes with IPRA-negative and IGRA-positive test results, most animals were also those with the most advanced pathology. We conclude that IP-10 and IFN-gamma concentrations measured in QFT Nil tubes may provide insight into the presence of M. bovis pathology in infected buffaloes. Furthermore, this study highlights the value in evaluating cytokine production in both antigen-stimulated and unstimulated samples when interpreting cytokine release assay results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据