4.0 Review

Lipopolysaccharides of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Biosynthesis and Structural Aspects

期刊

TRENDS IN GLYCOSCIENCE AND GLYCOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 184, 页码 E159-E171

出版社

GAKUSHIN PUBL CO
DOI: 10.4052/tigg.1749.7E

关键词

bacteria; cell wall polysaccharide; O-antigen; branching; biosynthesis

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2017-03703]
  2. Vinnova [2017-03703] Funding Source: Vinnova
  3. Swedish Research Council [2017-03703] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gram-negative bacteria are to a large extent covered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) anchored in the outer leaflet of their outer membrane. There are presently four described pathways for the O-antigen assembly of LPS, viz., synthase-, Wzk-, ABC-transporterand Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathways, where the latter two are used in Escherichia coli, subject to the O-antigen polysaccharide to be made. NDP-sugar monosaccharides are used by glycosyltransferases in the process of linking sugar residues together in the cytoplasm and depending on the biosynthetic pathway polymerization of the O-antigen takes place either in the cytoplasm (ABC-transporter pathway) or in the periplasm, where an oligosaccharide anchored in the inner membrane is flipped to the periplasmic side to this end (Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathway). Additions of sugars to form side-chains on the O-antigen may also occur in the periplasmic space. The degree of polymerization of the O-antigen is regulated to give a modal distribution, i.e., a narrow distribution around the most probable chain-length. The O-antigen is subsequently conjugated to the lipid A-core to form the LPS, which is transported across the periplasmic region by an ATP-driven mechanism as part of an LPS transport (Lpt) system. By using predictions of NDPmonosaccharide pathways and glycosyltransferase function it is shown how O-antigen structure can be elucidated rapidly by the computer program CASPER using bioinformatics data in conjunction with unassigned NMR data of the polysaccharide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据