4.7 Article

On the role of speed adaptation and spacing indifference in traffic instability: Evidence from car-following experiments and its stochastic model

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.09.014

关键词

Car following; Stochasticity; Speed adaptation; Spacing indifference; Traffic oscillation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB160090 0]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771168]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [71931002, 71621001, 71631002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mechanisms responsible for the emergence and evolution of oscillations in traffic flow has been a subject of intensive research by numerous scholars. In our previous work, we proposed a new mechanism to explain the generation of traffic oscillations: traffic instability caused by the competition between speed adaptation and stochastic effects. By conducting a closer examination of car following data obtained in a 25-car platoon experiment, we discovered in this work that the speed difference plays a more important role on car-following dynamics than the spacing, and when its amplitude is small, the growth of oscillations is mainly determined by the stochastic factors that follow the mean reversion process; when its amplitude increases, the growth of the oscillations is determined by the competition between the stochastic factors and the speed difference. An explanation is then provided, based on the above findings, to why the speed variance in the oscillatory traffic grows in a concave way along the platoon. We also proposed a mode-switching stochastic car-following model that incorporates the speed adaptation and spacing indifference behavior of drivers, which captures the observed characteristics of oscillation and discharge rate. Finally, our sensitivity analysis shows that the influence on oscillation growth and discharge rate is small by the reaction delay but large by the indifference region boundary. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据