4.2 Article

A parametric approach to construct femur models and their fixation plates

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 529-537

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2016.1145555

关键词

Femur surface model; feature parameterization; constraint; fixation plate design; computer-aided design

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472118]
  2. Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Support Project [BE2014048]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141158]
  4. Foundation of Changzhou Vocational Institute of Engineering [KJ15303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although anatomic plates reflect an important breakthrough in the treatment of distal femur fractures, there are still some patients experiencing healing complications. For individual differences in bone morphology and fractures, the development of patient specific plates is very complex and needs a long cycle. In this study, a parametric approach was proposed to conveniently construct femur models and design their fixation plates. First, the typical femur anatomy was described with the average femur model. Second, five surface features were defined to represent the femur surface model by setting up parameterization and parameter constraints. Third, according to the fracture information of a specific patient, customized plate surface with a suitable contour was created from the reconstructed femur model. Finally, the femur plate was represented by feature parameterization, and the hierarchical constraints between femur parameters and plate parameters were built to construct a plate model. The experimental results showed that the proposed method could effectively represent femur surface shape features and intuitively construct and edit individualized plates with high-level parameters. The method is competitive in time saving and design convenience and may provide a basic tool for digital restoration of incomplete femurs and the design of patient specific femur plates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据