4.6 Article

Concordance in advance care preferences among high-risk surgical patients and surrogate health care decision makers in the perioperative setting

期刊

SURGERY
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 396-403

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.013

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Society of University Surgeons-KARL STORZ Resident Research Award (2017-2018)
  2. Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging [1K76AG054859-01]
  3. Cambia Foundation
  4. American Geriatrics Society Geriatrics for Specialists Initiative
  5. National Cancer Institute [1R35CA197730-01]
  6. National Institute on Aging [95R01AG044518-02]
  7. PCORI [1502-27462]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Earlier studies have demonstrated poor concordance between patients' advance care preferences and those endorsed by their surrogate health care decision makers in a medical setting. This study aimed to determine concordance in the perioperative setting among high-risk patients and to identify areas for improvement. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study set in a preoperative clinic for high-risk patients. Patients (>55 y) and their surrogates (dyads) were eligible for participation. Dyads were surveyed on the patient's desire for advance care preferences (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, artificial nutrition) and tolerance for physical disability, cognitive disability, and chronic pain. Concordance was defined as the surrogate correctly predicting patient preferences. Patients and surrogates were resurveyed for concordance 30 to 60 d after the index procedure. Results: A total of 100 dyads (200 subjects) completed the survey. Median patient age was 68 y. Most patients were white (87%) and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III (88%). The majority of dyads (59%) reported prior conversations about advance care preferences. Concordance specifically for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 84%. In all other domains, <60% of dyads achieved concordance. Prior conversations regarding advance care preferences did not improve concordance in univariable or multivariable analysis. In postoperative surveys, substantial improvement was found in all domains except mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Conclusion: In all domains except cardiopulmonary resuscitation, concordance was <60% in the preoperative setting and was not improved among dyads who reported prior conversations regarding advance care preferences. Discordance may limit patient autonomy by prolonging undesired interventions or terminating desired interventions prematurely. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据