4.7 Article

Design optimization of a small-scale hydropower harvesting device

期刊

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 1303-1318

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02416-2

关键词

Hydropower; Reciprocating cylinder system; Power harvesting; Optimization; Genetic algorithm; Robins-Magnus effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a semi-analytical model that facilitates the optimum design of small-scale hydropower systems, so that maximum possible energy can be harvested under low head and streamflow conditions in run-of-the-stream settings. The hydropower harvesting model developed and tested at the University of Connecticut (Malla et al., Renewable Energy 36(5):1568-1577, 2011) comprises a rotating cylinder attached to a piston producing reciprocating motion when placed in moving water. Taking this model as the base, the semi-analytical model employs genetic algorithm-based optimization and develops optimal dimensions for the system, with the objective to minimize the time period while at the same time maximizing the stroke of the piston. The semi-analytical model is tested in steps: first with single-objective optimization for the time period and the stroke of the piston separately and then using multi-objective optimization to produce a set of Pareto optimal solutions. As many energy harvesting approaches are based on the reciprocating motion of the mechanical/structural system, which is greatly affected by the geometric dimensions of the system, optimization of the system geometry becomes crucial for energy harvesting. Compared to the hydropower harvesting model tested before (Malla et al., Renewable Energy 36(5):1568-1577, 2011), the semi-analytical model is able to reduce the arms' dimensions while obtaining a much higher stroke of piston for much lower time period. The model has some limitations but is able to produce optimization results comparable to laboratory experimental data and applicable to actual flow data from Shetucket River in Willimantic, CT, USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据